Today’s Highlight
Caste Names
Caste has again taken centre-stage in the context of the ensuing census. But, there is another aspect of caste – names – which is discussed in “Can neutral names erase caste?”
Bob’s Banter
Drunken Driving
Bob writes “Drunken Driving and Other Stories..!”
For more insightful articles by Bob, hit his website – www.bobsbanter.com
CocktailPlaza
Also have a look at our trivia/sublime, random quotes, Indiana and recycled humour in this section – as and when we schedule them afresh – or in the archives.
The CD on Laughter is loaded on this website for you to view/download.
The CD on laughter is loaded in the archives of this website for free downloading and use. Click on “laughter Plaza” on the top bar below the masthead on the home (front) page. Alert your friends who may be interested.
Stay with us and help us to grow!
- John B. Monteiro
Can Neutral Names Erase Caste?
By John B. Monteiro
What’s in a name? that which we call rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.
-William Shakespeare, English dramatic poet (1564-1616).
The comments on names go back to the Bible: “A good name rather to be chosen then great riches.” Proverbs XXII-1. Then again in Ecclesiastes VII-1: “A good name is better than precious ointment.” William Cowper, English poet (1731-1800):
Some to the fascination of a name,
Surrender judgment hoodwinked.
Names are evocative. Dawood Ibrahim evokes different image than Nehru or Gandhi. One of the things that Indian names, specially surnames, evoke is the caste of the person bearing the name. Such names evoke an image of respect or contempt. In this context, Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss, former Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare, argues, in an article in The Hindu (27-8-10) that caste names are an impediment to social justice and holistic development. Here are some excerpts from the article:
Social division and discrimination are not unique to India, nor is the practice restricted to any part of the globe. The slave system, the clan system, the class system are no different or less venomous than our own caste prejudices. But caste is the longest and most formidable of all forms of oppression still prevalent in the history of mankind. The word caste derives from the Portuguese ‘casta’ meaning race, breed or kind. In India is popularly referred to as ‘jati’ or ‘jaadi’. The original purpose of the caste system was social stratification according to occupation so that society could function in harmony. But, gradually it became exploitive, giving rise to social injustices and inequality among people.
Caste is a mantle or membership we acquire at birth. As we know, we not only inherit our genes from our parents but also our caste from our forefathers. How then we eliminate caste from this mainstream of our society? It would be naïve to think we can just wash it away. A lot has been said and written about the vagaries of the caste system. I am particularly perturbed by one of the commonest forms of discrimination that has been largely ignored at the least and denied at the worst – that is the practice of tagging caste of clan suffixes to given names like Sharma, Verma, Nair, Iyer, etc.
The effect of name should never be underestimated. What is in a name, one may wonder? Well what isn’t? The first thing we learn from a person after greeting him or her is his or her name. Names not only reflect or personality but also gives us the first inkling of the religion, race or community we belong to. We are named after our ancestors, family members, after popular icons, clan, occupation, religion or even the locality we are from. There is a confusing array of names, middle names, nick names, given names. You name it, it is there. But what concerns me most are the adhesive caste names the so-called intellectuals go by while vociferously demanding that casteism be abolished.
I am deeply intrigued when Mani Iyer or Ravi Verma or Rahul Shashtri talks or writes about a casteless society, or labels others as caste fanatics. Their intellectual posturing is exposed when they stubbornly refuse to let go of these commonly used suffixes which are purely caste or sect names. Their blatant flaunting of their caste is indeed ironic in itself and most devious simply because it is so subtle, and on the surface unapparent.
There have been numerous instances in the education and job sectors where examiners and interviewers have been fovourable to candidate of their own community by just glancing at the caste suffix names or vindictive to candidates whose community they loathe. This name-dropping has the tacit connivance of the teaching faculty which poses a challenge to the concept of equal opportunity. It is, however, not my contention that for a casteless society, we need a nameless one.
My great-grandfather’s name is Aanai Gounder, my grandfather’s name is Sanjeevaraya Gounder, where ‘Gounder’ denotes a caste name. My father’s name is S Ramadoss, while mine is Anbumani Ramadoss, which is just a patronymic, generic name.
Caste names are an impediment to social justice and to the holistic development of India. A welcome trend in recent times is the increasing adoption of neutral generic names that do not pertain to any religion or caste.
It would be naïve to assume that dispensing with caste names will lead to a casteless society. Caste names are only part of the problem rather than the solution. There is no pat solution to this dilemma. The adoption of generic names would be a small but definite step towards eradicating caste from this society.
The subject is open to many views. What are yours? Over to you.



